Too many workers and their families suffer from the failure of their employing organisations to provide safe and healthy working conditions. Injuries, acute and chronic ill-health and death occur all too frequently, also generating emotional and financial costs. Yet employing organisations are rarely held accountable for these outcomes. In fact, most of the associated costs are borne by those harmed and their families, and the taxpayer through the costs of paying benefits and providing health care. Those problems are exacerbated by the changing world of work. While the self-employed constitute around 15 percent of employment, they account for 30 percent of workplace fatalities.
There are major challenged for policy makers seeking to protect workers and members of the public in a period of unprecedented public sector cuts. Regulator authorities such as the Health and Safety Executive have seen their budgets fall by 40-48%. The number of safety inspectors on the front-line has fallen just as rapidly. The challenge, then is a political one: how do we build an evidence base that shows the long term damage to public safety that austerity is causing, and how do we use that evidence base to reverse the situation.
David Whyte’s research has involved a long-term analysis of a large data set that demonstrated how government policy has profoundly damaged workplace health and safety regulation. This finding detailed the impact of under-funding, under-enforcement policy and the “better regulation” regime between 1997 and 2010.
Subsequent policy analysis of the impact of the 2010 Coalition government policy established that the impact of austerity and a series of aggressive pro-business policies likely to significantly exacerbate risks in workplaces. Part of this research project involves the development of a detailed historical analysis of the UK’s failure to implement ILO compliant inspection and enforcement regimes; and a more general failure in UK government compliance with ILO health and safety standards. This research finding is based on a unique ‘benchmarking analysis’ of the UK’s compliance with ILO standards.
Working in partnerships
David Whyte’s research on the impact of austerity policies generally, and the reshaping policy in workplace safety regulation specifically, has been cited and used by trade unions and the Labour Party at the highest levels.
It has provided the foundations for the implementation of a series of concrete policy proposals that include: proposals for a rejuvenated system of health and safety enforcement; new administrative mechanisms; and legal reforms that adapt to the changing world of work.
This work has been developed in close collaboration with the Institute of Employment Rights (IER). Whyte’s underpinning research informs the policy proposals in the IER Manifesto for Labour Law project has had an impact on the development of policy in the UK Labour Party and trade union movement.
Outputs and outcomes
The Manifesto for Labour Law
The I.E.R.’s Manifesto for Labour Law helped formulate our 20 point plan for I’ll fear deal at work included in 2017 General Election Manifesto. We look forward to reforming today’s unfair labour laws.
—Jeremy Corbyn, Leader of the Labour Party
The I.E.R.’s Manifesto for Labour Law helps point the way forward to a brighter future
—Francis O’Grady, General Secretary, TUC
The Violence of Austerity
Watch a short video: (9 minutes, 26 seconds)
Vickie Cooper and David Whyte, 'The Violence of Austerity' (Pluto, 2017).
Power to the professors enriching the vocabulary of our times. Essential reading.
The Violence of Austerity is a vital reminder to tell the tragedy of modern Britain like it is.
—Alice Nutter, screenwriter and former singer, Chumbawumba.
An analytical masterpiece, describing what has happened to our communities as a result of austerity.—John McDonnell MP, Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer