amphitheater

The rise of populism: The politics of justice, anger, and grievance - George E. Marcus

3:30pm - 5:00pm / Thursday 25th February 2021
Type: Seminar / Category: Department
  • Admission: This is a free event, however, please register via the Eventbrite link provided
  • Book now
  • Add this event to my calendar
    (?)

    When you click on "Add this event to my calendar" your browser will download an ics file.

    Microsoft Outlook: Download the file, then you may be able to click on "Save & Close" to save it to your calendar. If that doesn't work go into Outlook, click on the File tab, then on Open, then Import. Select "Import an iCalendar (.ic or vCalendar file (.vcs)" then click on Next. Find the .ics file and click on OK.

    Google Calendar: download the file, then go into your calendar. On the right where it says "Other calendars" click on the arrow icon and then click on Import calendar. Click on Browse and select the .ics file, then click on Import.

    Apple Calendar: download the file, then you can either drag it to Calendar or import the file by going to File > Import > Import and choosing the .ics file.

For a very long time, human communities have faced periodic threats such as disease, violent attacks, terrorism, economic threats, and financial crises. There is considerable research which shows that people facing threats demand that those in authority exhibit strength and a forceful commitment to protecting the. In sum, threats drive the public to demand protection. Long before the term populism became popular, the role of collectivizing emotions in driving public reactions to social events has long been a concern for democratic governance. But which emotions drive social solidarity? And as group integrity is a variable, what role do emotions play in reducing group cohesion? The emotion that connects threat to the threat response is widely claimed to be fear. The belief that fear drives the threat response is very ancient. It has long been believed that fear signals the presence of threat and increases support for strong, even authoritarian, parties, leaders, and their programs. My argument is that fear is not the sole emotion linked to threat, and that threat-induced fear is often not the principal cause of people offering submissive fidelity to authority, generally, or specifically to authoritarian programs and leaders. This standard account is largely wrong because it ignores the influence of anger as a fundamental element in the evaluation of threat and political behavior.
Bio: George E. Marcus currently is emeritus in the Department of Political Science, Williams College. George does research in Political Psychology, Political Methodology and Elections, Public Opinion and Voting Behavior. His most central current project is 'The upcoming elections in Europe.' His focus has been in political tolerance, the role of emotions in politics, and reimagining democratic theory in light of the insights into the ancient but now archaic opposition of reason and passion provided by neuroscience.