The Referentiality of σχέτλιος in Archaic Greek Epic (Jordan Maly-Preuss, University of Oxford)

1:00pm - 2:00pm / Thursday 20th February 2020 / Venue: Seminar Room 6, Rendall Building
Type: Seminar / Category: Department
  • Add this event to my calendar

    When you click on "Add this event to my calendar" your browser will download an ics file.

    Microsoft Outlook: Download the file, then you may be able to click on "Save & Close" to save it to your calendar. If that doesn't work go into Outlook, click on the File tab, then on Open, then Import. Select "Import an iCalendar (.ic or vCalendar file (.vcs)" then click on Next. Find the .ics file and click on OK.

    Google Calendar: download the file, then go into your calendar. On the right where it says "Other calendars" click on the arrow icon and then click on Import calendar. Click on Browse and select the .ics file, then click on Import.

    Apple Calendar: download the file, then you can either drag it to Calendar or import the file by going to File > Import > Import and choosing the .ics file.

The term σχέτλιος in archaic epos presents a challenge for interpreters. Its valence is highly contextual and elusive of overarching definition; even its etymology is not certain. The prevailing themes in previous attempts to define the word, ‘obstinate’, ‘holding out’, ‘exceeding limits’, all point to a common core: resistance. This, I argue, is the base signification for σχέτλιος in the epic Kunstsprache, a signification which comprises two interacting aspects, resistance to change and resistance to order. Poets can be seen employing the term to draw out essential thematic concerns in their works: for instance, entities called σχέτλιος are labelled as resisting order-as-justice in Hesiod, and as resisting change that would enable ‘proper’ flow of the narrative (in the speaker’s view) in the Iliad.

I consider the full complement of σχέτλιος instances within archaic epos, examining the epithet with respect to its social dynamics, usage contexts, and the patterning of argumentation in surrounding passages, to achieve two goals – a better understanding of σχέτλιος and a demonstration of the variation possible within the traditional system of epic referentiality. We will see that poets were fully able to turn σχέτλιος to the purposes of their individual narratives while preserving its core reference, ‘resistant’.

This event is part of the Work in Progress Seminar Series.