Royal Institute of Philosophy Stapledon Colloquium
3:00pm - 5:00pm /
Monday 30th January 2017
Type: Seminar /
Category: Research
- School of the Arts - Department of Philosophy
- Suitable for: All welcome
- Admission: free
Add this event to my calendar
Click on "Create a calendar file" and your browser will download a .ics file for this event.
Microsoft Outlook: Download the file, double-click it to open it in Outlook, then click on "Save & Close" to save it to your calendar. If that doesn't work go into Outlook, click on the File tab, then on Open & Export, then Open Calendar. Select your .ics file then click on "Save & Close".
Google Calendar: download the file, then go into your calendar. On the left where it says "Other calendars" click on the arrow icon and then click on Import calendar. Click on Browse and select the .ics file, then click on Import.
Apple Calendar: The file may open automatically with an option to save it to your calendar. If not, download the file, then you can either drag it to Calendar or import the file by going to File >Import > Import and choosing the .ics file.
Royal Institute of Philosophy Stapledon Colloquium
30th January, School of the Arts Library, 3-5pm
Dr Katharine Jenkins
“Who's Afraid of Andrea Dworkin? Feminism and the Analytic Philosophy of Sex”
The nature of sexual desire has been a topic of profound interest to feminist theorists for some time, and certainly in the latter half of the 20th century. Yet this body of work is routinely overlooked by those working on this topic within the analytic tradition, resulting in two quite separate literatures. Focussing on the work of feminist theorist Andrea Dworkin – a distinctive and polarizing figure – I argue that much is lost by this partitioning. Dworkin’s work interrogates the connections between sexuality, gender, and dominance, aspects of sexual desire that are under-explored in the analytic philosophy of sex.
I first show how an analytic approach can help us get the most out of Dworkin’s intricate prose by clarifying ambiguous passages and disentangling distinct claims. Then, using Igor Primoratz’s account of sex as an example, I argue that analytic work on sexual desire would benefit greatly from Dworkin’s valuable insights about the social and political nature of sexual desire. A notable exception to the tendency to overlook Dworkin’s work is Seiriol Morgan; however, I argue that even Morgan does not account for the full implications of Dworkin’s arguments.
30th January, School of the Arts Library, 3-5pm
Dr Katharine Jenkins
“Who's Afraid of Andrea Dworkin? Feminism and the Analytic Philosophy of Sex”
The nature of sexual desire has been a topic of profound interest to feminist theorists for some time, and certainly in the latter half of the 20th century. Yet this body of work is routinely overlooked by those working on this topic within the analytic tradition, resulting in two quite separate literatures. Focussing on the work of feminist theorist Andrea Dworkin – a distinctive and polarizing figure – I argue that much is lost by this partitioning. Dworkin’s work interrogates the connections between sexuality, gender, and dominance, aspects of sexual desire that are under-explored in the analytic philosophy of sex.
I first show how an analytic approach can help us get the most out of Dworkin’s intricate prose by clarifying ambiguous passages and disentangling distinct claims. Then, using Igor Primoratz’s account of sex as an example, I argue that analytic work on sexual desire would benefit greatly from Dworkin’s valuable insights about the social and political nature of sexual desire. A notable exception to the tendency to overlook Dworkin’s work is Seiriol Morgan; however, I argue that even Morgan does not account for the full implications of Dworkin’s arguments.