Problem-based learning
To supplement your studies, and help "ground"
some of the more apparently academic concepts in physiology, we
will be considering a number of "cases". Some of these
are real cases, some are constructed especially for this exercise.
Occasionally we will mention a possible treatment regime, which
you may well consider to be ill-advised, old fashioned or downright
impracticable. This is deliberate, and the treatment regime will
have been chosen because it highlights a particular problem.
Please do not assume that a clinical treatment
suggested here is going to be the best course of action for one
of your patients.
You will be discussing several of the cases
in small groups, and we would like to suggest a particular technique
for approaching the problems, which is very well tried, tested
and researched.
Roles within the group
Each time your group meets to discuss a
case, you will need to elect a "scribe" to document
the proceedings on a flip chart or white board and summarise the
main points. You will also need to elect a Chairman, whose job
is to ensure that the process outlined below is actually followed,
and followed carefully. The jobs of Chairman and scribe should
be allocated to someone different at the beginning of each session,
so that everybody has a chance of doing each job more than once.
Role of the Tutor
You will usually have a tutor observing
the discussion. They are not there to give you physiological information,
and they will not. They are simply there to facilitate the group
process. They know the case well, and in some cases will have
the answers to particular questions (e.g. the results of any blood
tests which you might think necessary). It is important that you
find the answers for yourselves, even though this might seem frustrating
at times. If they think that you are going completely down a blind
alley they may try to guide you back to the substance of the problem,
but in most cases you will probably learn more from exploring
leads which you find interesting. Remember we have no syllabus
to speak of, we are simply trying to increase your breadth of
understanding of physiology.
The "Seven Step Process"
- Clarify terms and concepts that are not
clear in the written case study.
- Define the problem/problems. As concisely
as you can given the information to hand
- Analyse the problem. Brainstorming - write
down all the ideas that crop up, no matter how far fetched or
implausible. It is a general rule not to comment about ideas
during the brainstorming session - that comes later. You want
as large a number of possibilities written down as possible.
- List the possible explanations that resulted
from 3 above.
This time sift through the possibilities systematically. Link
concepts that fit together, try and see if there are relationships
between ideas. Discard ideas only if they are totally insane
(bearing in mind that penicillin came from a mistake....).
- Formulate learning objectives and set
priorities.
What will you need to find out before the next session in order
to solve the problem? Is there anything that you think that you
should know, which you have perhaps forgotten in the mists of
time? Is there something that you never quite understood? Many
problems will have more than one dimension, don't forget that,
but make sure that at least some of your time will be spent on
physiology!
- Look for additional information outside
the group.
You have the workbooks, your textbook, perhaps colleagues who
are likely to be able to help. You can also contact Dr Terry L. Gleave
(tlgleave@liverpool.ac.uk, or
telephone for an appointment, 0151 794 5352) for help with specific
questions - but please make sure that they are specific questions
rather than "what is the right answer to this case study..."
- Report back (do NOT speak from notes),
synthesise and test the information.
Usually this will be at the next timetabled session, and will
be the time when you gather everything together and realise how
easy it was. Occasionally you will want to know further information,
and will have another bite at the cherry before finalising your
solution. If you feel that it would help, it is quite in order
to meet your colleagues in the group outside "physiology
time" you don't necessarily need a "tutor" with
you.
Finally
- At the end of each session, think critically
about the way the group worked.
- How could the Chairman and scribe have
helped the group to work better?
- How did the tutor do their job?
- Did they facilitate the group process?
- Did they give too much information, or
too little?
- Did everyone in the group take an active
part?
- Did you personally put enough into the
session?
- What needs to be done better or differently
next time?