Village microfinance participants for clean air initiative

Tackling the silent “killer” in the kitchen: household air pollution

Household air pollution impacts three billion people who rely on solid fuels, making the simple act of cooking a major health hazard for more than a third of the world's population.

Household air pollution impacts three billion people who rely on solid fuels such as wood, charcoal or animal dung burned in inefficient stoves for heating and cooking. Preventive action could have massive, population-wide health benefits, particularly for women and children who share the majority of domestic burdens, and help to meet number 7 of the UN’s sustainable development goals: access to affordable, reliable, sustainable clean and modern energy for all.

Putting household air-pollution on the global agenda

“Our work is building on 15 years of research,” says Professor Daniel Pope who currently leads the Institute of Population Health research theme, Energy, Air Pollution and Health, at the University of Liverpool. “Our group co-led the first ever randomised control trial of an improved cooking stove in Guatemala, which proved hugely influential and helped put the household air pollution issue on the global agenda.” Indeed, household smoke is estimated to kill almost 4 million people every year – more than TB, AIDs and malaria combined.

To tackle the problem, the focus has been on burning biomass more cleanly using improved cookstoves. However, the work of Pope and others has identified that in lower and middle-income countries (LMICs) such stoves fail to achieve reductions in smoke anywhere near WHO safe guideline levels. As a result, in 2014 WHO guidelines for indoor air quality, led in development by the group through Liverpool’s Professor Nigel Bruce, had the explicit recommendation for LMICs to rapidly adopt clean household energy like gas and electricity. Based on this work the group produced a REF2014 case study rated in the top 20 out of 7000 for UK research having a global impact by UK-CDS.

Research that evaluates effective behaviour change strategies

So how can a population-wide transition to clean household energy be achieved? In 2016 Pope’s group launched a programme of community-based research in Cameroon, working alongside the government in its commitment to scale adoption of liquified petroleum gas (LPG) from 20% to 58% of the population by 2030 through a National LPG Masterplan.

Among strategies evaluated by the group were microfinance loans managed by village banking systems, the use of pressure cookers to reduce the amount of LPG needed to cook traditional food, and in-depth community participation using photography to identify barriers and enablers to using LPG. Public engagement was a crucial component of the work where findings were  communicated to policy makers involved in implementing policies related to the masterplan.

CLEAN-Air (Africa) - NIHR

The group is now researching how best to help populations switch from polluting fuels to LPG or ‘cooking gas’, working with the governments of Ghana and Kenya that also have ambitious targets to scale up LPG use, as well as Cameroon. This research is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) through a £2M Global Health Research Group award, entitled Clean Energy Access for the prevention of Non-communicable disease through clean Air in Africa, or CLEAN-Air (Africa), launched in November 2018.

Woman cooking with wood at home, smoke filled kitchen

Cooking with wood

Woman cooking with lpg at home

Cooking with LPG

The University of Liverpool’s Dr Rachel Anderson de Cuevas is project coordinator for CLEAN-Air (Africa) and describes its three-pronged approach of research, health system strengthening, and public and stakeholder engagement as key to its success. “We raise community awareness of household air pollution as a health and environmental problem and identify solutions within the community for addressing the issue through adoption of clean household energy. Importantly we then engage with the health sector to empower physicians and community health workers to communicate these messages and give communities a direct voice to policy makers through public and stakeholder engagement,” she says.