BEGIN:VCALENDAR
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/LondonVERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//University of Liverpool//University Events//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:20260513T150945-97540-UniversityOfLiverpool
DTSTAMP:20260513T150945
DTSTART:20210513T153000
DTEND:20210513T170000
LOCATION:
SUMMARY:Looking the other way? Selective media exposure and electoral punishment of corruption - Enrique Hernández
DESCRIPTION:Citizens are expected to punish corrupt politicians at the polls. In line with this presumption, lab and survey experiments consistently show that citizens are unlikely to vote for candidates that engage in corruption. At the same time, observational studies and field experiments frequently conclude that corrupt politicians are only mildly punished by voters. This apparent contradiction could be a consequence of the design implemented in previous lab and survey experiments. In the real world, individuals tend to avoid and downplay information that challenges previously held beliefs, like their partisanship. An experimental design that randomly informs participants about corruption, and disregards the fact that citizens are prone to self-select information, is highly unrealistic and might lead to an overestimation of the electoral consequences of corruption. Unlike previous studies, this paper implements a Preference Incorporating Choice and Assignment (PICA) experimental design in order to address the following question: how does information about corruption affect the likelihood of voting for corrupt politicians when accounting for information self-selection? Based on an online experiment conducted in Spain (N = 3,200), the PICA design allows us to estimate the electoral consequences of corruption accounting for the fact that citizens are able to overlook information about corruption from their preferred party, either by exposing themselves selectively to information about malfeasance from other parties or by avoiding information about corruption altogether. The PICA design increases ecological validity by explicitly modelling how citizens navigate information about malfeasance from different parties, while retaining the internal validity of fully randomized experiments.Bio: Enrique Hernández is a postdoctoral fellow at the Democracy, Elections and Citizenship research group at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. He completed a Ph.D. in Political and Social Sciences at the European University Institute in 2016. Enrique’s main research interests are in political attitudes, public opinion, electoral behavior, and political participation. His work has been published in Electoral Studies, the European Journal of Political Research, the European Political Science Review, European Union Politics, Political Analysis, and Research &amp; Politics.
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

