Prof Trevor Bench-Capon
Professor Computer Science
- Work email Tbc@liverpool.ac.uk
- Personal Websitewww.csc.liv.ac.uk/~tbc
- About
- Research
- Publications
- Professional Activities
Publications
Filter the publication list
Filter list by type
- Show all
- Journal article
- Conference paper
- Chapter
- Other
2023
A Note on Hierarchical Constraints (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. (2023). A Note on Hierarchical Constraints. IOS Press. doi:10.3233/faia230940Dimensions and Precedential Constraint: Factors Deriving from Multiple Dimensions (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2023). Dimensions and Precedential Constraint: Factors Deriving from Multiple Dimensions. IOS Press. doi:10.3233/faia230951Human Performance on the AI Legal Case Verdict Classification Task (Conference Paper)
Mumford, J., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2023). Human Performance on the AI Legal Case Verdict Classification Task. IOS Press. doi:10.3233/faia230988ANGELIC II (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2023). ANGELIC II. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/3594536.3595137ANGELIC II: An Improved Methodology for Representing Legal Domain Knowledge (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2023). ANGELIC II: An Improved Methodology for Representing Legal Domain Knowledge. In 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2023 - Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 12-21). doi:10.1145/3594536.3595137Combining a Legal Knowledge Model with Machine Learning for Reasoning with Legal Cases (Conference Paper)
Mumford, J., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2023). Combining a Legal Knowledge Model with Machine Learning for Reasoning with Legal Cases. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/3594536.3595158Whatever Happened to Hypotheticals? (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. (2023). Whatever Happened to Hypotheticals?. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/3594536.3595138Arguments, rules and cases in law: Resources for aligning learning and reasoning in structured domains (Journal article)
Steging, C., Renooij, S., Verheij, B., & Bench-Capon, T. (2023). Arguments, rules and cases in law: Resources for aligning learning and reasoning in structured domains. Argument & Computation, 14(2), 235-243. doi:10.3233/aac-220017Explainable AI Tools for Legal Reasoning about Cases: A Study on The European Court of Human Rights (Journal article)
Collenette, J., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2023). Explainable AI Tools for Legal Reasoning about Cases: A Study on The European Court of Human Rights. Artificial Intelligence, 103861. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2023.103861The Role of Intermediate Factors in Explaining Precedential Constraint. (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2023). The Role of Intermediate Factors in Explaining Precedential Constraint.. In F. Grasso, N. L. Green, J. Schneider, & S. Wells (Eds.), CMNA Vol. 3614 (pp. 21-32). CEUR-WS.org. Retrieved from https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-36142022
Implementing a Theory of a Legal Domain (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Gordon, T. F. (2022). Implementing a Theory of a Legal Domain. IOS Press. doi:10.3233/faia220444Reasoning with Legal Cases: A Hybrid ADF-ML Approach (Conference Paper)
Mumford, J., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2022). Reasoning with Legal Cases: A Hybrid ADF-ML Approach. IOS Press. doi:10.3233/faia220452Unpacking Arguments (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Verheij, B. (2022). Unpacking Arguments. IOS Press. doi:10.3233/faia220458Correction: thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade (Journal article)
Sartor, G., Araszkiewicz, M., Atkinson, K., Bex, F., Engers, T. V., Francesconi, E., . . . Bench-Capon, T. (2022). Correction: thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 30(4), 559. doi:10.1007/s10506-022-09333-8Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: overviews (Journal article)
Araszkiewicz, M., Bench-Capon, T., Francesconi, E., Lauritsen, M., & Rotolo, A. (2022). Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: overviews. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 30(4), 593-610. doi:10.1007/s10506-022-09324-9Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the first decade (Journal article)
Governatori, G., Bench-Capon, T., Verheij, B., Araszkiewicz, M., Francesconi, E., & Grabmair, M. (2022). Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the first decade. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 30(4), 481-519. doi:10.1007/s10506-022-09329-4Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade (Journal article)
Sartor, G., Araszkiewicz, M., Atkinson, K., Bex, F., van Engers, T., Francesconi, E., . . . Bench-Capon, T. (2022). Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 30(4), 521-557. doi:10.1007/s10506-022-09326-7Using Argumentation Schemes to Model Legal Reasoning (Preprint)
Argument Schemes for Factor Ascription (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2022). Argument Schemes for Factor Ascription. IOS Press. doi:10.3233/faia220142Thirty years of artificial intelligence and law: the third decade (Journal article)
Villata, S., Araszkiewicz, M., Ashley, K., Bench-Capon, T., Branting, L. K., Conrad, J. G., & Wyner, A. (2022). Thirty years of artificial intelligence and law: the third decade. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 30(4), 561-591. doi:10.1007/s10506-022-09327-6Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: Editor’s Introduction (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. (2022). Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: Editor’s Introduction. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 30(4), 475-479. doi:10.1007/s10506-022-09325-8Using Argumentation Schemes to Model Legal Reasoning. (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Atkinson, K. (2022). Using Argumentation Schemes to Model Legal Reasoning.. CoRR, abs/2210.00315.2021
Explaining Factor Ascription (Conference Paper)
Mumford, J., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2021). Explaining Factor Ascription. IOS Press. doi:10.3233/faia210335The need for good old fashioned ai and law (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. (n.d.). The Need for Good Old Fashioned AI and Law. Jusletter-IT, (fses). doi:10.38023/cefe7081-e6dd-49de-9592-9adbb6063fd6Argumentation schemes in AI and Law (Journal article)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2021). Argumentation schemes in AI and Law. Argument & Computation, 12(3), 417-434. doi:10.3233/aac-200543Audiences and Argument Strength (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. (2021). Audiences and Argument Strength. In ArgStrength 2021 (pp. 1-4). Hagen (online). Retrieved from http://argstrength2021.argumentationcompetition.org/Audiences and Argument Strength (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. (2021). Audiences and Argument Strength. In http://argstrength2021.argumentationcompetition.org/programme.html (pp. 1-3). Hagen (online).Value-based argumentation (Journal article)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2021). Value-based argumentation. Journal of Applied Logics, 8(6), 1543-1588.Using Issues to Explain Legal Decisions (Preprint)
Practical tools from formal models (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., Collenette, J., Bench-Capon, T., & Dzehtsiarou, K. (2021). Practical tools from formal models. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/3462757.3466095Precedential constraint (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2021). Precedential constraint. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/3462757.3466062Using Issues to Explain Legal Decisions. (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2021). Using Issues to Explain Legal Decisions.. In CoRR Vol. abs/2106.14688.Machine learning and legal argument (Conference Paper)
Mumford, J., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2021). Machine learning and legal argument. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings Vol. 2937 (pp. 47-56).Representing and Extracting Support via Complement-based Argumentation Frameworks (Conference Paper)
Mumford, J., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2021). Representing and Extracting Support via Complement-based Argumentation Frameworks. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings Vol. 3205 (pp. 29-38).Using Issues to Explain Legal Decisions. (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2021). Using Issues to Explain Legal Decisions.. In M. Araszkiewicz, M. Atzmueller, G. J. Nalepa, B. Verheij, & S. Bobek (Eds.), XAILA@ICAIL Vol. 3168. CEUR-WS.org. Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-31682020
Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and future (Journal article)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & Bollegala, D. (2020). Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and future. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 289. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2020.103387In memoriam Douglas N. Walton: the influence of Doug Walton on AI and law (Journal article)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., Bex, F., Gordon, T. F., Prakken, H., Sartor, G., & Verheij, B. (2020). In memoriam Douglas N. Walton: the influence of Doug Walton on AI and law. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 28(3), 281-326. doi:10.1007/s10506-020-09272-2An explainable approach to deducing outcomes in european court of human rights cases using ADFs (Conference Paper)
Collenette, J., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2020). An explainable approach to deducing outcomes in european court of human rights cases using ADFs. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications Vol. 326 (pp. 21-32). doi:10.3233/FAIA200488Before and after Dung: Argumentation in AI and Law (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2020). Before and after Dung: Argumentation in AI and Law. Argument & Computation, 11(1-2), 221-238. doi:10.3233/aac-190477Ethical Approaches and Autonomous Systems (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. (n.d.). Ethical Approaches and Autonomous Systems. Artificial Intelligence.Explaining legal decisions using IRAC (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. (2020). Explaining legal decisions using IRAC. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings Vol. 2669 (pp. 74-83).2019
A dialogical model of case law dynamics (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Henderson, J. (2019). A dialogical model of case law dynamics. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications Vol. 322 (pp. 163-168). doi:10.3233/FAIA190319Realising ANGELIC Designs Using Logiak (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., Routen, T., Sanchez, A., Whittle, S., Williams, R., & Wolfenden, C. (2019). Realising ANGELIC Designs Using Logiak. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (JURIX 2019) Vol. 322 (pp. 151-156). doi:10.3233/FAIA190317Demonstrating the Distinctions Between Persuasion and Deliberation Dialogues (Conference Paper)
Kirchev, Y., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2019). Demonstrating the Distinctions Between Persuasion and Deliberation Dialogues. In Unknown Conference (pp. 93-106). Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34885-4_7Describing the Development of Case Law (Conference Paper)
Henderson, J., & Bench-Capon, T. (2019). Describing the Development of Case Law. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/3322640.3326697Norms and Extended Argumentation Frameworks (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Modgil, S. (2019). Norms and Extended Argumentation Frameworks. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/3322640.3326696Reasoning with Legal Cases (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2019). Reasoning with Legal Cases. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/3322640.33266952018
Noise induced hearing loss: Building an application using the ANGELIC methodology (Journal article)
Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., Whittle, S., Williams, R., & Wolfenden, C. (2019). Noise induced hearing loss: Building an application using the ANGELIC methodology. ARGUMENT & COMPUTATION, 10(1), 5-22. doi:10.3233/AAC-181005Eveline T. Feteris: Fundamentals of legal argumentation - Springer, 2017, 2nd edn, pp. 363. (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2018). Eveline T. Feteris: Fundamentals of legal argumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 26(3), 307-314. doi:10.1007/s10506-018-9226-0Implementing Factors with Magnitude (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2018). Implementing Factors with Magnitude. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT (COMMA 2018) Vol. 305 (pp. 449-450). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-449Lessons from Implementing Factors with Magnitude (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2018). Lessons from Implementing Factors with Magnitude. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (JURIX 2018) Vol. 313 (pp. 11-20). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-935-5-11Relating the ANGELIC Methodology and ASPIC (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2018). Relating the ANGELIC Methodology and ASPIC. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT (COMMA 2018) Vol. 305 (pp. 109-116). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-109Taking Account of the Actions of Others in Value-based Reasoning (Journal article)
Atkinson, K. M., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2018). Taking Account of the Actions of Others in Value-based Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 254, 1-20. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2017.09.0022017
HYPO'S legacy: introduction to the virtual special issue. (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2017). HYPO'S legacy: introduction to the virtual special issue.. Artif. Intell. Law, 25, 205-250.Angelic environment (Conference Paper)
Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K., Atkinson, S., & Bench-Capon, T. (2017). Angelic environment. In Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/3086512.3086546Interpreting contracts using english common law rules as stated by Lord Hoffmann (Conference Paper)
Henderson, J., & Bench-Capon, T. (2017). Interpreting contracts using english common law rules as stated by Lord Hoffmann. In Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/3086512.3086522Arguing with Stories (Chapter)
Bex, F., & Bench-Capon, T. (2017). Arguing with Stories. In Argumentation Library (pp. 31-45). Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56883-6_3Arguing with dimensions in legal cases (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. (2017). Arguing with dimensions in legal cases. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings Vol. 2048 (pp. 2-6).Dimensions and Values for Legal CBR (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2017). Dimensions and Values for Legal CBR. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS Vol. 302 (pp. 27-32). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-838-9-27Noise Induced Hearing Loss: An Application of the Angelic Methodology (Conference Paper)
Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., Whittle, S., Williams, R., & Wolfenden, C. (2017). Noise Induced Hearing Loss: An Application of the Angelic Methodology. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS Vol. 302 (pp. 79-88). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-838-9-792016
ANGELIC Secrets: Bridging from factors to facts in US trade secrets (Conference Paper)
Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K. M., & Bench-Capon, T. (2016). ANGELIC Secrets: Bridging from factors to facts in US trade secrets. In IOS Press.Statement types in legal argument. (Conference Paper)
Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K. M., & Bench-Capon, T. (2016). Statement types in legal argument.. In IOS Press.Accommodating change (Journal article)
Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2016). Accommodating change. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, 24(4), 409-427. doi:10.1007/s10506-016-9190-5Special issue in memory of Carole Hafner: editor’s introduction (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2016). Special issue in memory of Carole Hafner: editor's introduction. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, 24(4), 325-345. doi:10.1007/s10506-016-9191-4States, goals and values: Revisiting practical reasoning (Journal article)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2016). States, goals and values: Revisiting practical reasoning. ARGUMENT & COMPUTATION, 7(2-3), 135-154. doi:10.3233/AAC-160011Dilemmas and paradoxes: cycles in argumentation frameworks (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2016). Dilemmas and paradoxes: cycles in argumentation frameworks. JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 26(4), 1055-1064. doi:10.1093/logcom/exu011A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using Abstract Dialectical Frameworks (Journal article)
Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2016). A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 24(1), 1-49. doi:10.1007/s10506-016-9178-1Argument Schemes for Reasoning About the Actions of Others (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2016). Argument Schemes for Reasoning About the Actions of Others. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications Vol. 287 (pp. 71-82). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-71Value Based Reasoning and the Actions of Others (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2016). Value Based Reasoning and the Actions of Others. In ECAI 2016: 22ND EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Vol. 285 (pp. 680-688). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-680Value-Based Reasoning and Norms (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. (2016). Value-Based Reasoning and Norms. In ECAI 2016: 22ND EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Vol. 285 (pp. 1664-1665). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-1664When and How to Violate Norms (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Modgil, S. (2016). When and How to Violate Norms. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS Vol. 294 (pp. 43-52). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-726-9-432015
Establishing norms with metanorms in distributed computational systems (Journal article)
Mahmoud, S., Griffiths, N., Keppens, J., Taweel, A., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Luck, M. (2015). Establishing norms with metanorms in distributed computational systems. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, 23(4), 367-407. doi:10.1007/s10506-015-9176-8Transition systems for designing and reasoning about norms (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2015). Transition systems for designing and reasoning about norms. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, 23(4), 345-366. doi:10.1007/s10506-015-9175-9Evaluating the use of abstract dialectical frameworks to represent case law (Conference Paper)
Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2015). Evaluating the use of abstract dialectical frameworks to represent case law. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/2746090.2746111Factors, issues and values (Chapter)
Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2015). Factors, issues and values. ACM. doi:10.1145/2746090.2746103Senses of ‘argument’ in instantiated argumentation frameworks† (Journal article)
Wyner, A., Bench-Capon, T., Dunne, P., & Cerutti, F. (2015). Senses of ‘argument’ in instantiated argumentation frameworks†. Argument & Computation, 6(1), 50-72. doi:10.1080/19462166.2014.1002535Cases and Stories, Dimensions and Scripts (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Bex, F. (2015). Cases and Stories, Dimensions and Scripts. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS Vol. 279 (pp. 11-20). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-609-5-11Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems XVIII (Journal article)
Hameurlain, A., Küng, J., Wagner, R., Decker, H., Lhotska, L., & Link, S. (Eds.) (2015). Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems XVIII. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46485-4Two Tools for Prototyping Legal CBR (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Gordon, T. (2015). Two Tools for Prototyping Legal CBR. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS Vol. 279 (pp. 177-178). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-609-5-177Using Argumentation to Structure E-Participation in Policy Making (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., Atkinson, K., & Wyner, A. (2015). Using Argumentation to Structure E-Participation in Policy Making. In TRANSACTIONS ON LARGE-SCALE DATA- AND KNOWLEDGE-CENTERED SYSTEMS XVIII: SPECIAL ISSUE ON DATABASE- AND EXPERT-SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS Vol. 8980 (pp. 1-29). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46485-4_12014
Arguments as a new perspective on character motive in stories (Journal article)
Bex, F., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2014). Arguments as a new perspective on character motive in stories. LITERARY AND LINGUISTIC COMPUTING, 29(4), 467-487. doi:10.1093/llc/fqu054Abstract Dialectical Frameworks for Legal Reasoning (Chapter)
Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2014). Abstract Dialectical Frameworks for Legal Reasoning. In Unknown Book (Vol. 271, pp. 61-70). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-468-8-61Analysing Norms with Transition Systems (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. (2014). Analysing Norms with Transition Systems. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS Vol. 271 (pp. 29-38). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-468-8-29Argument-Based Policy Consultation Through Crowd Sourcing (Chapter)
Crawford, J., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2014). Argument-Based Policy Consultation Through Crowd Sourcing. In Unknown Book (Vol. 271, pp. 199-200). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-468-8-199Distributing Coalition Value Calculations to Self-Interested Agents (Conference Paper)
Riley, L., Payne, T. R., Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2014). Distributing Coalition Value Calculations to Self-Interested Agents. In AAMAS'14: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMOUS AGENTS & MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS (pp. 1431-1432). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Distributing coalition value calculations to self-interested agents (Conference Paper)
Riley, L., Payne, T., Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2014). Distributing coalition value calculations to self-interested agents. In Thirteenth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS 2014) (pp. 1421-1432). -: IFAAMAS.Extracting and understanding arguments about motives from stories (Conference Paper)
Bex, F., & Bench-Capon, T. (2014). Extracting and understanding arguments about motives from stories. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings Vol. 1341.Fostering Co-operative Behaviour Through Social Intervention (Conference Paper)
Lloyd-Kelly, M., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2014). Fostering Co-operative Behaviour Through Social Intervention. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications. doi:10.5220/0005039505780585Fostering Co-operative behaviour through social intervention (Conference Paper)
Lloyd-Kelly, M., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2014). Fostering Co-operative behaviour through social intervention. In SIMULTECH 2014 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications.From Oral Hearing to Opinion in The US Supreme Court (Conference Paper)
Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2013). From Oral Hearing to Opinion in The US Supreme Court. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS Vol. 259 (pp. 1-10). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-359-9-1Support for Factor-Based Argumentation (Conference Paper)
Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2014). Support for Factor-Based Argumentation. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT Vol. 266 (pp. 447-448). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-436-7-447Taking the Long View: Looking Ahead in Practical Reasoning (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2014). Taking the Long View: Looking Ahead in Practical Reasoning. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT Vol. 266 (pp. 109-120). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-436-7-109Taking the long view: Looking ahead in practical reasoning (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2014). Taking the long view: Looking ahead in practical reasoning. In Fifth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2014) (pp. In press). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Understanding narratives with argumentation (Conference Paper)
Bex, F., & Bench-Capon, T. (2014). Understanding narratives with argumentation. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT Vol. 266 (pp. 11-18). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-436-7-112013
On the Instantiation of Knowledge Bases in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A., Bench-Capon, T., & Dunne, P. (2013). On the Instantiation of Knowledge Bases in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In COMPUTATIONAL LOGIC IN MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, CLIMA XIV Vol. 8143 (pp. 34-50). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Structuring E-Participation in Policy Making through Argumentation (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. (2013). Structuring E-Participation in Policy Making through Argumentation. In Unknown Conference (pp. 4-6). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40285-2_2Argument schemes for reasoning with legal cases using values (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., Prakken, H., Wyner, A., & Atkinson, K. (2013). Argument schemes for reasoning with legal cases using values. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/2514601.2514604Argumentation based tools for policy-making (Conference Paper)
Wardeh, M., Wyner, A., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2013). Argumentation based tools for policy-making. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/2514601.2514640Distinctive features of persuasion and deliberation dialogues (Journal article)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & Walton, D. (2013). Distinctive features of persuasion and deliberation dialogues. Argument & Computation, 4(2), 105-127. doi:10.1080/19462166.2012.708670Strategies for question selection in argumentative dialogues about plans (Journal article)
Medellin-Gasque, R., Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & McBurney, P. (2013). Strategies for question selection in argumentative dialogues about plans. Argument & Computation, 4(2), 151-179. doi:10.1080/19462166.2013.764927Dynamic assignment of roles, rights and responsibilities in normative multi-agent systems (Journal article)
Derakhshan, F., Bench-Capon, T., & McBurney, P. (2013). Dynamic assignment of roles, rights and responsibilities in normative multi-agent systems. JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 23(2), 355-372. doi:10.1093/logcom/exr027'Dialogues in US supreme court oral hearings' (Conference Paper)
Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2013). 'Dialogues in US supreme court oral hearings'. In Thirteenth Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (pp. In press). -: Springer.A Strategy for Efficient Persuasion Dialogues (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, P., & Bench-Capon, T. (2013). A Strategy for Efficient Persuasion Dialogues. In Unknown Conference (pp. 332-347). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36907-0_22Argumentation Schemes for Reasoning about Factors with Dimensions (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., Prakken, H., & Wyner, A. (2013). Argumentation Schemes for Reasoning about Factors with Dimensions. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS Vol. 259 (pp. 39-48). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-359-9-39From oral hearing to opinion in the U.S. supreme court (Conference Paper)
Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2013). From oral hearing to opinion in the U.S. supreme court. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications Vol. 259 (pp. 1-10). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-359-9-1On the Instantiation of Knowledge Bases in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A. Z., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Dunne, P. E. (2013). On the Instantiation of Knowledge Bases in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks.. In J. Leite, T. C. Son, P. Torroni, L. V. D. Torre, & S. Woltran (Eds.), CLIMA Vol. 8143 (pp. 34-50). Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-92012
Multi-agent based classification using argumentation from experience (Journal article)
Wardeh, M., Coenen, F., & Bench-Capon, T. (2012). Multi-agent based classification using argumentation from experience. AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 25(3), 447-474. doi:10.1007/s10458-012-9197-6Model Based Critique of Policy Proposals (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A. Z., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2012). Model Based Critique of Policy Proposals. In ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION, EPART 2012 Vol. 7444 (pp. 120-131). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T., Araszkiewicz, M., Ashley, K., Atkinson, K., Bex, F., Borges, F., . . . Wyner, A. Z. (2012). A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 20(3), 215-319. doi:10.1007/s10506-012-9131-xUsing argumentation to model agent decision making in economic experiments (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T., Atkinson, K., & McBurney, P. (2012). Using argumentation to model agent decision making in economic experiments. AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 25(1), 183-208. doi:10.1007/s10458-011-9173-6EFFICIENCY IN PERSUASION DIALOGUES (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, P., & Bench-Capon, T. (2012). EFFICIENCY IN PERSUASION DIALOGUES. In ICAART: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL. 2 (pp. 23-32). doi:10.5220/0003727400230032Emotion as an enabler of co-operation (Conference Paper)
Lloyd-Kelly, M., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2012). Emotion as an enabler of co-operation. In ICAART 2012 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence Vol. 2 (pp. 164-169).Open Texture and Argumentation: What Makes an Argument Persuasive? (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. (2012). Open Texture and Argumentation: What Makes an Argument Persuasive?. In Unknown Conference (pp. 220-233). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29414-3_12A factor-based definition of precedential constraint (Journal article)
Horty, J. F., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2012). A factor-based definition of precedential constraint. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 20(2), 181-214. doi:10.1007/s10506-012-9125-8PISA: A framework for multiagent classification using argumentation (Journal article)
Wardeh, M., Coenen, F., & Capon, T. B. (2012). PISA: A framework for multiagent classification using argumentation. DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 75, 34-57. doi:10.1016/j.datak.2012.03.001Arguments over Co-operative Plans (Conference Paper)
Medellin-Gasque, R., Atkinson, K., McBurney, P., & Bench-Capon, T. (2012). Arguments over Co-operative Plans. In Unknown Conference (pp. 50-66). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_4Representing Popov v Hayashi with dimensions and factors (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2012). Representing Popov v Hayashi with dimensions and factors. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 20(1), 15-35. doi:10.1007/s10506-012-9118-7'A strategy for deliberation exploiting accrual of values' (Conference Paper)
Al-Abdulkarim, L., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2012). 'A strategy for deliberation exploiting accrual of values'. In Ninth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 1-19). Berlin: Springer.'Towards a formal language for argumentation schemes' (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2012). 'Towards a formal language for argumentation schemes'. In Ninth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 203-222). Berlin: Springer.A Model-Based Critique Tool for Policy Deliberation (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A., Wardeh, M., Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2012). A Model-Based Critique Tool for Policy Deliberation. In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2012) Vol. 250 (pp. 167-176). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-167-0-167Critiquing Justifications for Action Using a Semantic Model: Demonstration (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2012). Critiquing Justifications for Action Using a Semantic Model: Demonstration. In Computational Models of Argument Vol. 245 (pp. 503-504). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-503Marek Sergot: A Memoir (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. (2012). Marek Sergot: A Memoir. In Unknown Conference (pp. 1-3). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29414-3_1Opinion gathering using a multi-agent systems approach to policy selection. (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A. Z., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2012). Opinion gathering using a multi-agent systems approach to policy selection.. In W. V. D. Hoek, L. Padgham, V. Conitzer, & M. Winikoff (Eds.), AAMAS (pp. 1171-1172). IFAAMAS. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2343576Persuasion Strategies for Argumentation about Plans (Conference Paper)
Medellin-Gasque, R., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2012). Persuasion Strategies for Argumentation about Plans. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT Vol. 245 (pp. 334-341). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-334Semi-Automated Argumentative Analysis of Online Product Reviews (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A., Schneider, J., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2012). Semi-Automated Argumentative Analysis of Online Product Reviews. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT Vol. 245 (pp. 43-+). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-43The Long and Winding Road: Forty Years of Argumentation (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. (2012). The Long and Winding Road: Forty Years of Argumentation. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT Vol. 245 (pp. 3-10). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-3Uniform Argumentation Frameworks (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & Dunne, P. E. (2012). Uniform Argumentation Frameworks. In Computational Models of Argument Vol. 245 (pp. 165-176). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-111-3-165What Makes a System a Legal Expert? (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. (2012). What Makes a System a Legal Expert?. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (JURIX 2012) Vol. 250 (pp. 11-20). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-167-0-112011
Metalevel argumentation (Journal article)
Modgil, S., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2011). Metalevel argumentation. JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 21(6), 959-1003. doi:10.1093/logcom/exq054Towards a Structured Online Consultation Tool (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2011). Towards a Structured Online Consultation Tool. In ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION, EPART 2011 Vol. 6847 (pp. 286-297). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., Prakken, H., & Visser, W. (2011). Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/2018358.2018361Semantic models for policy deliberation (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K. M., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., Cartwright, D., & Wyner, A. Z. (2011). Semantic models for policy deliberation. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/2018358.2018369Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A. Z., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Atkinson, K. M. (2011). Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/2018358.2018359Arguing from experience using multiple groups of agents (Journal article)
Wardeh, M., Bench-Capon, T., & Coenen, F. (2011). Arguing from experience using multiple groups of agents. Argument & Computation, 2(1), 51-76. doi:10.1080/19462166.2010.528176'Arguments over co-operative plans' (Conference Paper)
Medellin-Gasque, R., Atkinson, K., McBurney, P., & Bench-Capon, T. (2011). 'Arguments over co-operative plans'. In First International Workshop on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentations (pp. To appear). Berlin: Springer.'Towards a structured online consultation tool' (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2011). 'Towards a structured online consultation tool'. In Third International Conference on eParticipation (pp. To appear). Berlin: Springer.Multi-agent Based Classification Using Argumentation from Experience (Conference Paper)
Wardeh, M., Coenen, F., Bench-Capon, T., & Wyner, A. (2011). Multi-agent Based Classification Using Argumentation from Experience. In ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, PT II Vol. 6635 (pp. 357-369). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Populating an Online Consultation Tool (Conference Paper)
Pulfrey-Taylor, S., Henthorn, E., Atkinson, K., Wyner, A., & Bench-Capon, T. (2011). Populating an Online Consultation Tool. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS Vol. 235 (pp. 150-+). doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-981-3-150Relating Values in a Series of Supreme Court Decisions (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. (2011). Relating Values in a Series of Supreme Court Decisions. In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems Vol. 235 (pp. 13-22). doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-981-3-13What Makes a Story Plausible? The Need for Precedents (Conference Paper)
Bex, F., Bench-Capon, T., & Verheij, B. (2011). What Makes a Story Plausible? The Need for Precedents. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS Vol. 235 (pp. 23-+). doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-981-3-232010
Emotions in Rational Decision Making (Conference Paper)
Nawwab, F. S., Bench-Capon, T., & Dunne, P. E. (2010). Emotions in Rational Decision Making. In ARGUMENTATION IN MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS Vol. 6057 (pp. 273-291). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Multi-Party Argument from Experience (Conference Paper)
Wardeh, M., Bench-Capon, T., & Coenen, F. (2010). Multi-Party Argument from Experience. In ARGUMENTATION IN MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS Vol. 6057 (pp. 216-235). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Arguing Global Governance (Chapter)
Bjola, C., & Kornprobst, M. (Eds.) (n.d.). Arguing Global Governance. In . Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203842577A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC (Journal article)
Prakken, H., Wyner, A., Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2015). A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC. JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 25(5), 1141-1166. doi:10.1093/logcom/ext010Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T., & Prakken, H. (2010). Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 18(2), 153-174. doi:10.1007/s10506-010-9094-8A lightweight formal model of two-phase democratic deliberation (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Prakken, H. (2010). A lightweight formal model of two-phase democratic deliberation. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS Vol. 223 (pp. 27-36). doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-682-9-27Arguing in Groups (Conference Paper)
Wardeh, M., Coenen, F., & Bench-Capon, T. (2010). Arguing in Groups. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF COMMA 2010 Vol. 216 (pp. 475-486). doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-475Argumentation schemes: From informal logic to computational models (Chapter)
Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2010). Argumentation schemes: From informal logic to computational models. In C. Reed, & C. Tindale (Eds.), Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation: An examination of Douglas Walton's theories of reasoning' (pp. 103-114). London: College Publications.Computation in Extended Argumentation Frameworks (Conference Paper)
Dunne, P. E., Modgil, S., & Bench-Capon, T. (2010). Computation in Extended Argumentation Frameworks. In ECAI 2010 - 19TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Vol. 215 (pp. 119-124). doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-606-5-119Exploring the Role of Emotions in Rational Decision Making (Conference Paper)
Nawwab, F. S., Dunne, P. E., & Bench-Capon, T. (2010). Exploring the Role of Emotions in Rational Decision Making. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF COMMA 2010 Vol. 216 (pp. 367-378). doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-367Integrating Dialectical and Accrual Modes of Argumentation (Conference Paper)
Modgil, S., & Bench-Capon, T. (2010). Integrating Dialectical and Accrual Modes of Argumentation. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF COMMA 2010 Vol. 216 (pp. 335-346). doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-335Persuasive stories for multi-agent argumentation (Conference Paper)
Bex, F. J., & Bench-Capon, T. (2010). Persuasive stories for multi-agent argumentation. In AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report Vol. FS-10-04 (pp. 4-5).Reports on the AAAI 2009 Fall Symposia (Journal article)
Azevedo, R., Bench‐Capon, T., Biswas, G., Carmichael, T., Green, N., Hadzikadic, M., . . . Souvenir, R. (2010). Reports on the AAAI 2009 Fall Symposia. AI Magazine, 31(1), 88-94. doi:10.1609/aimag.v31i1.22892009
Abstract Argumentation and Values (Chapter)
Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2009). Abstract Argumentation and Values. In ARGUMENTATION IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (pp. 45-64). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_3Action-state semantics for practical reasoning (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2009). Action-state semantics for practical reasoning. In AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report Vol. FS-09-06 (pp. 8-13).Argumentation in Legal Reasoning (Chapter)
Bench-Capon, T., Prakken, H., & Sartor, G. (2009). Argumentation in Legal Reasoning. In ARGUMENTATION IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (pp. 363-382). doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_18Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Fall Symposium - Technical Report: Preface (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., Parsons, S., & Prakken, H. (2009). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Fall Symposium - Technical Report: Preface. In AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report Vol. FS-09-06.Instantiating knowledge bases in abstract argumentation frameworks (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A., Bench-Capon, T., & Dunne, P. (2009). Instantiating knowledge bases in abstract argumentation frameworks. In AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report Vol. FS-09-06 (pp. 76-83).Logic and Law Corner (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T., & Prakken, H. (2009). Logic and Law Corner. JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 19(6). doi:10.1093/logcom/exn105Modelling Judicial Context in Argumentation Frameworks (Journal article)
Wyner, A., & Bench-Capon, T. (2009). Modelling Judicial Context in Argumentation Frameworks. JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 19(6), 941-968. doi:10.1093/logcom/exp009Arguing from Experience to Classifying Noisy Data (Conference Paper)
Wardeh, M., Coenen, F., & Bench-Capon, T. (2009). Arguing from Experience to Classifying Noisy Data. In DATA WAREHOUSING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, PROCEEDINGS Vol. 5691 (pp. 354-365). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/PADUA: a protocol for argumentation dialogue using association rules (Journal article)
Wardeh, M., Bench-Capon, T., & Coenen, F. (2009). PADUA: a protocol for argumentation dialogue using association rules. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 17(3), 183-215. doi:10.1007/s10506-009-9078-8Case law in extended argumentation frameworks (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Modgil, S. (2009). Case law in extended argumentation frameworks. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/1568234.1568248Isomorphism and argumentation (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Gordon, T. F. (2009). Isomorphism and argumentation. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM. doi:10.1145/1568234.1568237Did he jump or was he pushed? (Journal article)
Bex, F., Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2009). Did he jump or was he pushed?. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 17(2), 79-99. doi:10.1007/s10506-009-9074-zDid he jump or was he pushed?: Abductive practical reasoning (Journal article)
Bex, F., Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2009). Did he jump or was he pushed?: Abductive practical reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 17(2), 79-99. doi:10.1007/s10506-009-9074-zCo-ordination and Co-operation in Agent Systems: Social Laws and Argumentation (Chapter)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2009). Co-ordination and Co-operation in Agent Systems: Social Laws and Argumentation. In Unknown Book (Vol. 5384, pp. 122-140). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/'Supporting argument in e-democracy' (Conference Paper)
Cartwright, D., Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2009). 'Supporting argument in e-democracy'. In A. Prosser, & P. Parycek (Eds.), EDEM 2009 (pp. 151-160). Vienna: Austrian Computer Society.A case study of hypothetical and value-based reasoning in US Supreme-Court cases (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Prakken, H. (2009). A case study of hypothetical and value-based reasoning in US Supreme-Court cases. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS: JURIX 2009: THE TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL CONFERENCE Vol. 205 (pp. 11-20). doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-082-7-11Altruism and agents: An argumentation based approach to designing agent decision mechanisms (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., Atkinson, K., & McBurney, P. (2009). Altruism and agents: An argumentation based approach to designing agent decision mechanisms. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS Vol. 2 (pp. 974-981).Altruism and agents: an argumentation based approach to designing agent decision mechanisms. (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., Atkinson, K., & McBurney, P. (2009). Altruism and agents: an argumentation based approach to designing agent decision mechanisms.. In C. Sierra, C. Castelfranchi, K. S. Decker, & J. S. Sichman (Eds.), AAMAS (2) (pp. 1073-1080). IFAAMAS. Retrieved from http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/conf/atal/aamas2009-2.htmlMulti-Party Argument from Experience (Conference Paper)
Wardeh, M., Bench-Capon, T., & Coenen, F. P. (2009). Multi-Party Argument from Experience. In ARGMAS'09 (pp. 207-224). Budapest: AAMAS.PISA — Pooling Information from Several Agents: Multiplayer Argumentation from Experience (Conference Paper)
Wardeh, M., Bench-Capon, T., & Coenen, F. (2009). PISA — Pooling Information from Several Agents: Multiplayer Argumentation from Experience. In Unknown Conference (pp. 133-146). Springer London. doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-171-2_102008
Towards Dynamic Assignment of Rights and Responsibilities to Agents (Short Version) (Conference Paper)
Derakhshan, F., McBurney, P., & Bench-Capon, T. (2008). Towards Dynamic Assignment of Rights and Responsibilities to Agents (Short Version). In ADVANCES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING Vol. 6 (pp. 1004-1008). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Value-based arguments in the dictator game (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2008). Value-based arguments in the dictator game. In AAAI Workshop - Technical Report Vol. WS-08-09 (pp. 1-6).Abstract argumentation scheme frameworks (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2008). Abstract argumentation scheme frameworks. In ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: METHODOLOGY, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS Vol. 5253 (pp. 220-234). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Addressing moral problems through practical reasoning (Journal article)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2008). Addressing moral problems through practical reasoning. Journal of Applied Logic, 6(2), 135-151. doi:10.1016/j.jal.2007.06.005Introducing the logic and law corner (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T., & Prakken, H. (2008). Introducing the logic and law corner. JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 18(1), 1-12. doi:10.1093/logcom/exm060'Did He Jump or Was He Pushed? Abductive Practical Reasoning' (Conference Paper)
Bex, F., Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2008). 'Did He Jump or Was He Pushed? Abductive Practical Reasoning'. In JURIX 2008 (pp. 139-149). Florence: IOS Press.A Methodology for Action-Selection using Value-Based Argumentation (Conference Paper)
Nawwab, F. S., Bench-Capon, T., & Dunne, P. E. (2008). A Methodology for Action-Selection using Value-Based Argumentation. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, PROCEEDINGS OF COMMA 2008 Vol. 172 (pp. 264-275). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Argument Based Moderation of Benefit Assessment (Conference Paper)
Wardeh, M., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Coenen, F. (2008). Argument Based Moderation of Benefit Assessment. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS Vol. 189 (pp. 128-137). doi:10.3233/978-1-58603-952-3-128Arguments from Experience: The PADUA Protocol (Conference Paper)
Wardeh, M., Bench-Capon, T., & Coenen, F. (2008). Arguments from Experience: The PADUA Protocol. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, PROCEEDINGS OF COMMA 2008 Vol. 172 (pp. 405-416). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Asking the Right Question: Forcing Commitment in Examination Dialogues (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., Doutre, S., & Dunne, P. E. (2008). Asking the Right Question: Forcing Commitment in Examination Dialogues. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, PROCEEDINGS OF COMMA 2008 Vol. 172 (pp. 49-+). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Did He Jump or Was He Pushed? Abductive Practical Reasoning (Conference Paper)
Bex, F., Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2008). Did He Jump or Was He Pushed? Abductive Practical Reasoning. In LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS Vol. 189 (pp. 138-+). doi:10.3233/978-1-58603-952-3-138Integrating Object and Meta-Level Value Based Argumentation (Conference Paper)
Modgil, S., & Bench-Capon, T. (2008). Integrating Object and Meta-Level Value Based Argumentation. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, PROCEEDINGS OF COMMA 2008 Vol. 172 (pp. 240-+). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Modelling Judicial Context in Argumentation Frameworks (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A., & Bench-Capon, T. (2008). Modelling Judicial Context in Argumentation Frameworks. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, PROCEEDINGS OF COMMA 2008 Vol. 172 (pp. 417-428). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/The PADUA Protocol (Conference Paper)
Wardeh, M., Bench-Capon, T., & Coenen, F. (2008). The PADUA Protocol. In COMMA 2008 (pp. 405-416). Toulouse: IOS Press.Three Senses of “Argument” (Chapter)
Wyner, A. Z., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Atkinson, K. (n.d.). Three Senses of “Argument”. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 146-161). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_102007
Three senses of "argument" (Chapter)
Wyner, A. Z., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Atkinson, K. (2007). Three senses of "argument". In Unknown Book (Vol. 4884 LNAI, pp. 146-161). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9-10Action-based alternating transition systems for arguments about action (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2007). Action-based alternating transition systems for arguments about action. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence Vol. 1 (pp. 24-29).Argumentation in artificial intelligence (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Dunne, P. E. (2007). Argumentation in artificial intelligence. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 171(10-15), 619-641. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.001Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems (Journal article)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2007). Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 171(10-15), 855-874. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.009Argumentation and standards of proof (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2007). Argumentation and standards of proof. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. ACM. doi:10.1145/1276318.1276339Argumentation over ontology correspondences in MAS (Conference Paper)
Laera, L., Blacoe, I., Tamma, V., Payne, T., Euzenat, J., & Bench-Capon, T. (2007). Argumentation over ontology correspondences in MAS. In Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. ACM. doi:10.1145/1329125.1329400Artificial Inteligence (Edited special journal issue)
Dunne, P. E., & Bench-Capon, T. (Eds.) (2007). Artificial Inteligence (Vol. 171). Elsevier.PARMENIDES: Facilitating Deliberation in Democracies (Journal article)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & McBurney, P. (2007). PARMENIDES: Facilitating Deliberation in Democracies. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 14(4), 261-275. doi:10.1007/s10506-006-9001-5An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application (Journal article)
Chorley, A., & Bench-Capon, T. (2007). An empirical investigation of reasoning with legal cases through theory construction and application. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 13(3-4), 323-371. doi:10.1007/s10506-006-9016-y'Three senses of "argument"' (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A. Z., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Atkinson, K. M. (2007). 'Three senses of "argument"'. In The 2007 Workshop on Argumentation and Non-Monotonic Reasoning (pp. 1-16). Tempe: LPMNR.Action-based alternating transition systems for arguments about action (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K. M., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2007). Action-based alternating transition systems for arguments about action. In Twenty Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 6). Menlo Park: AAAI Press.Argument Schemes for Legal Case-based Reasoning (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A., & Bench-Capon, T. (2007). Argument Schemes for Legal Case-based Reasoning. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications Vol. 165 (pp. 139-149).Arguments, Values and Baseballs: Representation of Popov v. Hayashi (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A., Bench-Capon, T., & Atkinson, K. (2007). Arguments, Values and Baseballs: Representation of Popov v. Hayashi. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications Vol. 165 (pp. 151-160).Audiences in argumentation frameworks (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., Doutre, S., & Dunne, P. E. (2007). Audiences in argumentation frameworks. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 171(1), 42-71. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2006.10.013Dynamic Rule Mining for Argumentation Based Systems (Conference Paper)
Wardeh, M., Bench-Capon, T., & Coenen, F. (n.d.). Dynamic Rule Mining for Argumentation Based Systems. In Unknown Conference (pp. 65-78). Springer London. doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-094-0_6PADUA protocol:TB Strategies and tactics (Conference Paper)
Wardeh, M., Bench-Capon, T., & Coenen, F. (2007). PADUA protocol:TB Strategies and tactics. In SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, PROCEEDINGS Vol. 4724 (pp. 465-+). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Towards an extensible argumentation system (Conference Paper)
Wyner, A. Z., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2007). Towards an extensible argumentation system. In SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, PROCEEDINGS Vol. 4724 (pp. 283-+). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/2006
ARGUMENTATION (Chapter)
Bench-Capon, T., & Prakken, H. (n.d.). ARGUMENTATION. In Information Technology and Lawyers (pp. 61-80). Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/1-4020-4146-2_3Agents arguing over ontology alignments (Conference Paper)
Laera, L., Tamma, V., Euzenat, J., Bench-Capon, T., & Payne, T. (2006). Agents arguing over ontology alignments. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings Vol. 223.Arguing over ontology alignments (Conference Paper)
Laera, L., Tamma, V., Euzenat, J., Bench-Capon, T., & Payne, T. (2006). Arguing over ontology alignments. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings Vol. 225.Computational representation of practical argument (Journal article)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & McBurney, P. (2006). Computational representation of practical argument. SYNTHESE, 152(2), 157-206. doi:10.1007/s11229-005-3488-2Addressing Moral Problems Through Practical Reasoning (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2006). Addressing Moral Problems Through Practical Reasoning. In Unknown Conference (pp. 8-23). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/11786849_4Agent-based argumentation for Ontology Alignmnent (Conference Paper)
Laera, L., Tamma, V., Bench-Capon, T., & Euzenat, J. (2006). Agent-based argumentation for Ontology Alignmnent. In ECAI 2006 (pp. NA). Riva del Garda: NA.Argumentation (Chapter)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Prakken, H. (2006). Argumentation. In A. R. Lodder, & A. Oskamp (Eds.), Information Technology & Lawyers: Advanced technology in the legal domain, from challenges to daily routine. (pp. not known). Berlin: Springer.Argumentation for decision support (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & Modgil, S. (2006). Argumentation for decision support. In DATABASE AND EXPERT SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS Vol. 4080 (pp. 822-831). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Automating Argumentation for Deliberation in Cases of Conflict of Interest (Conference Paper)
Chorley, A., Bench-Capon, T., & McBurney, P. (2006). Automating Argumentation for Deliberation in Cases of Conflict of Interest. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT Vol. 144 (pp. 279-290). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Complexity Properties of Restricted Abstract Argument Systems (Conference Paper)
Dunne, P. E. (2006). Complexity Properties of Restricted Abstract Argument Systems. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications Vol. 144 (pp. 85-96).Computational Models of Argument (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Dunne, P. E. (Eds.) (2006). Computational Models of Argument. In COMMA 06 (pp. 341). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006, September 11-12, 2006, Liverpool, UK (Conference Paper)
Dunne, P. E., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (Eds.) (2006). Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006, September 11-12, 2006, Liverpool, UK. In COMMA Vol. 144. IOS Press.Justifying Actions by Accruing Arguments (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Prakken, H. (2006). Justifying Actions by Accruing Arguments. In COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT Vol. 144 (pp. 247-+). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Modelling State Intervention in Cases of Conflicting Interests (Conference Paper)
Chorley, A., & Bench-Capon, T. (2006). Modelling State Intervention in Cases of Conflicting Interests. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications Vol. 152 (pp. 31-40).Preface (Chapter)
Dunne, P. E., Bench-Capon, T., & Wooldridge, M. (2006). Preface. In Unknown Book (Vol. 144, pp. v).Reaching Agreement over Ontology Alignments (Conference Paper)
Laera, L., Tamma, V., Euzenat, J., Bench-Capon, T., & Payne, T. (2006). Reaching Agreement over Ontology Alignments. In Unknown Conference (pp. 371-384). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/11926078_27Reaching agreement over ontology alignments (Conference Paper)
Laera, L., Tamma, V., Euzenat, J., Bench-Capon, T., & Payne, T. (2006). Reaching agreement over ontology alignments. In SEMANTIC WEB - ISEC 2006, PROCEEDINGS Vol. 4273 (pp. 371-384). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Zeno Revisited: Representation of Persuasive Argument (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2006). Zeno Revisited: Representation of Persuasive Argument. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications Vol. 152 (pp. 1-10).2005
Determining preferences through argumentation (Conference Paper)
Doutre, S., Bench-Capon, T. R., & Dunne, P. E. (2005). Determining preferences through argumentation. In AI*IA2005: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS Vol. 3673 (pp. 98-109). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Discovering Inconsistency through Examination Dialogues (Conference Paper)
Dunne, P. E., Doutre, S., & Bench-Capon, T. (2005). Discovering Inconsistency through Examination Dialogues. In 19TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI-05) (pp. 1680-1681). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Explaining preferences with argument positions (Conference Paper)
Doutre, S., Bench-Capon, T., & Dunne, P. E. (2005). Explaining preferences with argument positions. In 19TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI-05) (pp. 1560-1561). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Generating intentions through argumentation (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & McBurney, P. (2005). Generating intentions through argumentation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents (pp. 1351-1352).Persuasion and value in legal argument (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T., Atkinson, K., & Chorley, A. (2005). Persuasion and value in legal argument. JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 15(6), 1075-1097. doi:10.1093/logcom/exi058A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action (Journal article)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & Mcburney, P. (2005). A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action. AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 11(2), 153-171. doi:10.1007/s10458-005-1166-xGenerating intentions through argumentation (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & McBurney, P. (2005). Generating intentions through argumentation. In Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. ACM. doi:10.1145/1082473.1082723AGATHA (Conference Paper)
Chorley, A., & Bench-Capon, T. (2005). AGATHA. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. ACM. doi:10.1145/1165485.1165493Application of argument based machine learning to law (Conference Paper)
Možina, M., Žabkar, J., Bench-Capon, T., & Bratko, I. (2005). Application of argument based machine learning to law. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. ACM. doi:10.1145/1165485.1165532Arguing about cases as practical reasoning (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & McBurney, P. (2005). Arguing about cases as practical reasoning. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. ACM. doi:10.1145/1165485.1165492AGATHA: Using heuristic search to automate the construction of case law theories (Journal article)
Chorley, A., & Bench-Capon, T. (2005). AGATHA: Using heuristic search to automate the construction of case law theories. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 13(1), 9-51. doi:10.1007/s10506-006-9004-2Argument Based Machine Learning Applied to Law (Journal article)
Možina, M., Žabkar, J., Bench-Capon, T., & Bratko, I. (2005). Argument Based Machine Learning Applied to Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 13(1), 53-73. doi:10.1007/s10506-006-9002-4Argumentation in AI and Law: Editors' Introduction (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Dunne, P. E. (2005). Argumentation in AI and Law: Editors' Introduction. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 13(1), 1-8. doi:10.1007/s10506-006-9007-zLegal Case-based Reasoning as Practical Reasoning (Journal article)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2005). Legal Case-based Reasoning as Practical Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 13(1), 93-131. doi:10.1007/s10506-006-9003-3'Persuasive political argument' (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K. M., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & McBurney, P. (2005). 'Persuasive political argument'. In F. Grasso, C. Reed, & G. Carenini (Eds.), Fifth International Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA 2005) (pp. 44-51). Edinburgh, Scotland: IJCAI.'Why Argue? Dialogue Types and Argumentation in Agent Interaction' (Journal article)
Atkinson, K. M., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2005). 'Why Argue? Dialogue Types and Argumentation in Agent Interaction'. AgentLink Newsletter, (19), 12-13. Retrieved from http://www.agentlink.org/newsletter/19/AL-19.pdfA dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & McBurney, P. (2005). A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action. In ARGUMENTATION IN MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS Vol. 3366 (pp. 149-161). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Argument Based Machine Learning Applied to Law (Conference Paper)
Mozina, M., Zabkar, J., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Bratko, I. (2005). Argument Based Machine Learning Applied to Law. In International Conference on AI and Law (pp. 248-249). New York: ACM press.Argument Based Machine Learning Applied to Law (Chapter)
Mozina, M., Zabkar, J., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Bratko, I. (2005). Argument Based Machine Learning Applied to Law. In P. E. Dunne, & T. J. M. Bench-Capon (Eds.), Argumentation in AI and Law (pp. 87-93). Nijmegan: Woolf Legal Publishers.Argumentation in AI and Law (Book)
Dunne, P. E., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (Eds.) (2005). Argumentation in AI and Law. Nijmegan: Woolf Publishing.Constructing Theories of Case Law Through Argumentation (Chapter)
Chorley, A., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2005). Constructing Theories of Case Law Through Argumentation. In P. E. Dunne, & T. J. M. Bench-Capon (Eds.), Argumentation in AI and Law (pp. 13-25). Nijmegan: Woolf Legal Publishers.Levels of reasoning with legal cases. (Chapter)
Atkinson, K. M., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2005). Levels of reasoning with legal cases.. In P. E. Dunne, & T. J. M. Bench-Capon (Eds.), Argumentation in AI and Law (pp. 1-11). Nijmegan: Woolf Legal Publishers.Multi-Agent Argumentation for eDemocracy. (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & McBurney, P. (2005). Multi-Agent Argumentation for eDemocracy.. In M. -P. Gleizes, G. A. Kaminka, A. Nowé, S. Ossowski, K. Tuyls, & K. Verbeeck (Eds.), EUMAS (pp. 35-46). Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van Belie voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten. Retrieved from http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/conf/eumas/eumas2005.htmlTheory and Practice in AI and Law: A Response to Branting (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., & Bench-Capon, T. (2005). Theory and Practice in AI and Law: A Response to Branting. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications Vol. 134 (pp. 1-12).2004
SweetProlog: A system to integrate ontologies and rules (Conference Paper)
Laera, L., Tamma, V., Bench-Capon, T., & Semeraro, G. (2004). SweetProlog: A system to integrate ontologies and rules. In RULES AND RULE MARKUP LANGUAGES FOR THE SEMANTIC WEB, PROCEEDINGS Vol. 3323 (pp. 188-193). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Book Review: Bram Roth, Case-based Reasoning in the Law: A Formal Theory of Reasoning by Case Comparison. Ph. D. Thesis, The University of Maastricht, 2003. 181 pp. (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. (2004). Book Review: Bram Roth, Case-based Reasoning in the Law: A Formal Theory of Reasoning by Case Comparison. Ph. D. Thesis, The University of Maastricht, 2003. 181 pp.. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 12(3), 227-229. doi:10.1007/s10506-004-3889-4Complexity in value-based argument systems (Conference Paper)
Dunne, P. E., & Bench-Capon, T. (2004). Complexity in value-based argument systems. In LOGICS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS Vol. 3229 (pp. 360-371). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30227-8_31Identifying audience preferences in legal and social domains (Conference Paper)
Dunne, P. E., & Bench-Capon, T. (2004). Identifying audience preferences in legal and social domains. In DATABASE AND EXPERT SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS Vol. 3180 (pp. 518-527). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Justifying practical reasoning (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K. M., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & McBurney, P. (2004). Justifying practical reasoning. In F. Grasso, C. Reed, & G. Carenini (Eds.), Computational Models of Natural Argument (pp. 87-90). Valencia: ECAI.PARMENIDES: Facilitating democratic debate (Chapter)
Atkinson, K. M., Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & McBurney, P. J. (2004). PARMENIDES: Facilitating democratic debate. In R. Traunmüller (Ed.), Electronic Government (Vol. 3183, pp. 313-316). Berlin: Springer.PARMENIDES: Facilitating democratic debate (Conference Paper)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & McBurney, P. (2004). PARMENIDES: Facilitating democratic debate. In ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT, PROCEEDINGS Vol. 3183 (pp. 313-316). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Support for constructing theories in case law domains (Conference Paper)
Chorley, A., & Bench-Capon, T. (2004). Support for constructing theories in case law domains. In DATABASE AND EXPERT SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS Vol. 3180 (pp. 508-517). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/2003
Developing legal knowledge based systems through theory construction (Conference Paper)
Chorley, A., & Bench-Capon, T. (2003). Developing legal knowledge based systems through theory construction. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL '03. ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1047788.1047805Towards a computational account of persuasion in law (Conference Paper)
Greenwood, K., Capon, T. B., & McBurney, P. (2003). Towards a computational account of persuasion in law. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law - ICAIL '03. ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1047788.1047792Try to See it My Way: Modelling Persuasion in Legal Discourse (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2003). Try to See it My Way: Modelling Persuasion in Legal Discourse. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 11(4), 271-287. doi:10.1023/b:arti.0000045997.45038.8fA model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T., & Sartor, G. (2003). A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 150(1-2), 97-143. doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00108-5Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency (Journal article)
Dunne, P. E., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2003). Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 149(2), 221-250. doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00076-6Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2003). Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 13(3), 429-448. doi:10.1093/logcom/13.3.429Computational Models, Argumentation Theories and Legal Practice (Chapter)
Bench-Capon, T., Freeman, J. B., Hohmann, H., & Prakken, H. (2003). Computational Models, Argumentation Theories and Legal Practice. In Argumentation Library (pp. 85-120). Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0431-1_4Semantics for Interoperability (Chapter)
Bench-Capon, T., Malcolm, G., & Shave, M. (2003). Semantics for Interoperability. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 703-712). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45227-0_69Semantics for Interoperability: Relating Ontologies and Schemata. (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., Malcolm, G., & Shave, M. J. R. (2003). Semantics for Interoperability: Relating Ontologies and Schemata.. In V. Marík, W. Retschitzegger, & O. Stepánková (Eds.), DEXA Vol. 2736 (pp. 703-712). Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/b11824Semantics for interoperability - Relating ontologies and schemata (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., Malcolm, G., & Shave, M. (2003). Semantics for interoperability - Relating ontologies and schemata. In DATABASE AND EXPERT SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS Vol. 2736 (pp. 703-712). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Structuring dialogue between the people and their representatives (Conference Paper)
Greenwood, K., Bench-Capon, T., & McBurney, P. (2003). Structuring dialogue between the people and their representatives. In ELECTRONIC GOVENMENT, PROCEEDINGS Vol. 2739 (pp. 55-62). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/Suggestions for Standard Example Sets. (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2003). Suggestions for Standard Example Sets.. In Evaluation of Legal Reasoning and Problem-Solving Systems (pp. 17). ACM. Retrieved from http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/conf/icail/icailw2003.html2002
Coherence in finite argument systems (Journal article)
Dunne, P. E., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2002). Coherence in finite argument systems. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 141(1-2), 187-203. doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00261-8(Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2002). Unknown Title. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 10(1/3), 79-94. doi:10.1023/a:1019501830692Value Based Argumentation Frameworks (Preprint)
An ontology model to facilitate knowledge-sharing in multi-agent systems (Journal article)
Tamma, V., & Bench-Capon, T. (2002). An ontology model to facilitate knowledge-sharing in multi-agent systems. KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 17(1), 41-60. doi:10.1017/S0269888902000371Attribute meta-properties for formal ontological analysis (Conference Paper)
Tamma, V., & Capon, J. M. B. (2002). Attribute meta-properties for formal ontological analysis. In KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, PROCEEDINGS Vol. 2473 (pp. 301-316). Retrieved from https://www.webofscience.com/No agent is an island (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Dunne, P. E. (2002). No agent is an island. In Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems part 2 - AAMAS '02. ACM Press. doi:10.1145/544862.544907No agent is an island: A framework for the study of inter-agent behavior (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Dunne, P. E. (2002). No agent is an island: A framework for the study of inter-agent behavior. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents (pp. 690-691).Value Based Argumentation Frameworks (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2002). Value Based Argumentation Frameworks. CoRR, cs.AI/0207059.Value-based argumentation frameworks. (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2002). Value-based argumentation frameworks.. In S. Benferhat, & E. Giunchiglia (Eds.), NMR (pp. 443-454). Retrieved from http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/conf/nmr/nmr2002.html2001
Dynamic arguments in a case law domain (Conference Paper)
Henderson, J., & Bench-Capon, T. (2001). Dynamic arguments in a case law domain. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. ACM. doi:10.1145/383535.383542Theory based explanation of case law domains (Conference Paper)
Bench-Capon, T., & Sartor, G. (2001). Theory based explanation of case law domains. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law. ACM. doi:10.1145/383535.383537An enriched knowledge model for formal ontological analysis (Conference Paper)
Tamma, V. A. M., & Bench-Capon, T. (2001). An enriched knowledge model for formal ontological analysis. In Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems - Volume 2001. ACM. doi:10.1145/505168.505177Functional ontology artifacts: Existent and emergent knowledge (Journal article)
O'Leary, D. E. (2001). Functional ontology artifacts: Existent and emergent knowledge. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 16(3), 411-424. doi:3.0.CO;2-M">10.1002/1098-111X(200103)16:3<411::AID-INT1015>3.0.CO;2-MDOI: 10.1002/1098-111X(200103)16:3<411::AID-INT1015>3.0.CO;2-M
KRAFT: An agent architecture for knowledge fusion (Journal article)
Preece, A., Hui, K., Gray, A., Marti, P., Bench-Capon, T., Cui, Z., & Jones, D. (2001). KRAFT: An agent architecture for knowledge fusion. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COOPERATIVE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 10(1-2), 171-195. doi:10.1142/S0218843001000308The role of ontologies in the verification and validation of knowledge-based systems (Journal article)
Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2001). The role of ontologies in the verification and validation of knowledge-based systems. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 16(3), 377-390. doi:3.0.co;2-5">10.1002/1098-111x(200103)16:3<377::aid-int1013>3.0.co;2-5DOI: 10.1002/1098-111x(200103)16:3<377::aid-int1013>3.0.co;2-5